VIRTUALLY LIVE COVERAGE
Presentaions
Interviews
Speakers
Open Mic
Reports
AYF

PARTICIPATION
CENTER

Chat Rooms
Discussion
Board
Q & A
Links

About PAC2

About 
Asianbridges

Home

Saturday 5:45 - 6:35 PM
TTI 301/2
The future role of grammar in TESOL in Korea 
Hee-ok Kyung
University of New South Wales, Australia

The way Korean learners have learned English has been static for a very long time: six years of grammar during school years; a few years of developing communication ability during undergraduate years; then some time for preparing for TOFEL/TOEIC in order to gain employment in an extremely competitive employment. In other words, grammar first, then communication, and then four integrative skills. Some Korean learners of English still become quite proficient but many of them do not. Does grammar-based instruction deserve its recent heavy criticism? Is the communicative method always desirable and highly effective in any social or cultural context? And given the contextualized English teaming environment in Korea, what are the advantages and drawbacks of different types of syllabi, such as structural, notional-functional, communicative, lexical or integrated syllabi? These are the questions to be addressed in this paper.